Allowed

Shambhu Ram v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Jun 2022CR. MISC./54885/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner, apprehending his arrest under multiple Sections including IPC, Epidemic Disease Act, and Disaster Management Act, subject to furnishing bail bonds and satisfying the conditions of Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail within eight weeks via bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Shambhu Ram Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54885 of 2021

¶3

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2021 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran

¶4

======================================================

¶5

SHAMBHU RAM, Son of Late Mahadev Ram Resident of Village- Majhar Pakaridayal, P.S.- Pakridayal, District- East Champaran Motihari

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinay Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Ataur Rahman

¶12

======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR

¶14

ORAL ORDER

¶15

2 15-06-2022

¶16

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶17

the State.

¶18

The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending his arrest, in connection with Madhuban P. S. Case No. 133 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 188, 268, 269, 270, 271, 341, 353 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code; Section 3 of the Epidemic Disease Act, 1897; and Section 51 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005.

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54885 of 2021(2) dt.15-06-2022 2/4

¶20

Prosecution story in brief is that when the

¶21

informant and other police personnel proceeded for night patrolling, 30-35 persons gathered near the house of one Rameshwar Rai and made protest against them.

¶22

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. No specific overt act has been attributed against the petitioner. Apart from this, it has been submitted that the similarly situated persons have already been granted anticipatory bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 08.04.2022, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 41639 of 2021.

¶23

It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the petition that no similar petition has been earlier filed by the petitioner either before this Court or before the Hon'ble Apex Court.

¶24

It has further been stated that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶25

However, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶26

Considering the aforesaid facts and

¶27

circumstances, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be

¶28

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54885 of 2021(2) dt.15-06-2022 3/4

¶29

released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Ld. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, in connection with Madhuban P. S. Case No. 133 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and on the following conditions:

¶30

(i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedent, the learned court below shall cancel the bail bond of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent despite his knowledge of the same.

¶31

(ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, the learned court below shall cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

¶32

The application stands allowed accordingly.

¶33

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54885 of 2021(2) dt.15-06-2022 4/4

¶34

The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the office within a period of one month and the Registry is directed to issue the certified copy of this order only after removal of office objections.

¶35

(Jitendra Kumar, J)

¶36

skm/-

¶37

U T

Shambhu Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shambhu Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Janardan Sah @ Janardhan Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Sandip Kumar @ Sandip Raut @ Sanjit Raut Vs The State of Bihar

Shivam Kumar @ Shiva Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Naresh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Yadav @ Rajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Chhotu @ Chandan Kumar Vs the State of Bihar