Allowed

Manoj Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Apr 2022CR. MISC./55672/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner applied for regular bail in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The Court granted bail as the petitioner was not arrested at the scene and had been in custody for nine months post-chargesheet submission.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge II-cum-Special Judge, Nawa

Manoj Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55672 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-221 Year-2021 Thana- SIRDALA District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MANOJ CHAUDHARY Son of Lae Bandho Chaudhary Resident of VillageChamotha Laund, P.S.- Sirdala, District- Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 05-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶12

The petitioner has preferred this application for

¶13

grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 30(a), 30(d) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶14

As per the prosecution case, on a raid being conducted, 3 litres of country liquor and 300 litres of Mahua solution was recovered from the place of occurrence. The accused persons escaped. The petitioner was identified by the Choukidar amongst the accused persons who had managed to escape.

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no incriminating article has been recovered from the petitioner’s possession. He has no concern with the seized liquor, Mahua solution or the place of recovery. The cause of his

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55672 of 2021(2) dt.05-04-2022 2/2

¶17

false implication is his antecedents. He is in custody since 27.6.2021 and chargesheet has been submitted in the case.

¶18

Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶19

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts of the case, the petitioner not having been arrested at the spot, he having remained in custody for 9 months and chargesheet having been submitted in the case, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Sirdala P.S. Case no.221 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge II-cum-Special Judge, Nawada.

¶20

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶21

Saurabh/-

¶22

U T

Manoj Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manoj Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Uraon @ Sunil Urawn Vs The State of Bihar

Arjun Sah Vs the State of Bihar

Shivam Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Chaudhary @ Manoj Kumar Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Rizu Khan Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Kaif @ Banti Vs The State of Bihar