Allowed

Shivam Sahani v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Apr 2022CR. MISC./50072/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a criminal miscellaneous application for regular bail. The petitioner sought release in a case involving the NDPS Act, IPC, and Arms Act. The mere recovery of a motorcycle, claimed to be stolen, did not justify keeping him in custody. After hearing, the court directed his bail on specified conditions.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with N.D.P.S Case no. 43 of 2021 on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Shivam Sahani Vs The State of Bihar — Corruption | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50072 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-278 Year-2021 Thana- MOTIHARI MUFASIL District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SHIVAM SAHANI S/O Krishna Sahani Resident of Village - Bhataha, P.S. - Muffasil, District - East Champaran, Motihari.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amit Kumar Rakesh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶9

4 04-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶10

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant

¶11

of regular bail in a case registered under sections 414, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, sections 25(1-B) (a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act and sections 8, 20(B)(ii) and (c) of the NDPS Act.

¶12

As per the prosecution case, one country made pistol, three live cartridges, charas etc were recovered from the possession of the accused persons. It is stated that in the attempt to escape, some of the accused including the petitioner herein fell down and a stolen motorcycle was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. So far as charas is concerned, the same was recovered from the possession of co-accused Ovarsiya

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50072 of 2021(4) dt.04-04-2022 2/2

¶14

Sahani.

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no incriminating article has been recovered from the petitioner's possession who has been falsely implicated in the case. He is in custody since 2.6.2021 and charge sheet has been submitted in the case.

¶16

Heard learned APP for the State.

¶17

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case including the petitioner having remained in custody for 9 months, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with N.D.P.S. Case no. 43 of 2021 (arising out of Mufassil P.S. Case no. 278 of 2021) on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge/Special Judge, East Champaran, Motihari.

¶18

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶19

Prakash/-

¶20

Shivam Sahani v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shivam Sahani v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhushan @ Bablu @ Anand Bhushan Vs The State of Bihar

Dilip Kumar Das Vs The State of Bihar

Amlesh Kumar @ Amlesh Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Uraon @ Sunil Urawn Vs The State of Bihar

Arjun Sah Vs the State of Bihar

Ajay Singh Vs the State of Bihar