Allowed

Raj Kapur Raj v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC14 Oct 2022CR. MISC./53554/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving alleged licking violation. The court directed release upon arrest or surrender within six weeks by furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Direction to release petitioner on bail upon arrest or surrender within six weeks via Rs. 20,000 bond with two sureties.

Raj Kapur Raj Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53554 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2022 Thana- BHAPTIAHI District- Supaul

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Raj Kapur Raj, Son Of Binda Singh R/O Saidpur, Panapur, P.S.- Bidupur, District- Vaishali

... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Asha Devi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 14-10-2022

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State through video conferencing.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act.

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of one case and the allegation is of recovery of 10019.7 litres of liquor from a container.

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession. It is next submitted that petitioner is neither the owner, nor the driver of the alleged vehicle and he came to be implicated based on confessional statement of Amandeep, who is alleged to be the driver of the

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53554 of 2022(2) dt.14-10-2022 2/2

¶17

vehicle, in police custody which per se does not have any evidentiary value.

¶18

Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.

¶19

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Bhaptiyahi P. S. Case No.10 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶20

The application stands allowed.

¶21

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶22

vikash/-

¶23

U T

Raj Kapur Raj v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raj Kapur Raj v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh Kumar @ Kaju Vs The State of Bihar

Ashtosh Kumar @ Anshu Kumar @ Anshu Patel Vs the State of Bihar

Sushant Kumar Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Prem Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Mantosh Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Rai @ Manoj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar