to connect him with the offense directly, further one accused Sonu was apprehended during the course of investigation whose statement was recorded at paragraph ‘47’ of the case diary wherein he has confessed before the police that he had also helped various accused persons, including the petitioner, in committing the occurrence, it is next submitted that Sonu had taken name of the father of this petitioner also, it is further submitted that father of this petitioner had personally gone to the police station when he was called and accordingly he was arrested and thereafter his confessional statement was taken in which he has stated that earlier the deceased had shot the petitioner, however, the matter was compromised but the petitioner was under constant fear that the deceased might kill him, accordingly father of the petitioner planned to kill the deceased along with other accused persons as they were also on an inimical term with the deceased for the reason that the deceased used to loot their liquor, further petitioner’s father has confessed that one Ankit Patel called him and informed that he has shot Sipu Patel and thus asked him to verify whether he is dead or alive. Learned senior counsel thus submits that even from the confessional statement of the father of the petitioner it does not even remotely manifest that petitioner was also involved in the occurrence rather what his father has disclosed is that it
