Allowed

Manoj Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Jun 2022CR. MISC./5306/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court granted bail to petitioner in a theft case under IPC Sections 379 and 411, noting his inclusion was owing to enmity by an accomplice. Bail allowed on ₹25,000 bond subject to charge framing, close relative surety, and presence conditions.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail with bond of Rs. 25,000 and two sureties of like amount each, subject to conditions including close relative surety and presence at court.

Manoj Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5306 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-224 Year-2021 Thana- PAKRIDAYAL District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Manoj Kumar Yadav, Son of Ramadhar Ray @ Ramdhar Ray, Resident of Village- Pakaridayal Jagatiya, Ward No. 2, P.S.- Pakaridayal, District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shakil Ahmad Khan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs.Indu Kumari Srivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 09-06-2022

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶11

Let the defect (s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

¶12

In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Pakridayal P.S. Case No. 224 of 2021 registered for the alleged offences under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

The prosecution case is that the co-accused Ratan Kumar stole away the tractor of the informant and later on named the petitioner as one of his associates in the crime.

¶14

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR and

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5306 of 2022(2) dt.09-06-2022 2/3

¶16

due to enmity, the named co-accused Ratan Kumar has taken the name of the petitioner for being his associate. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and the recovery of the tractor was made from the inlaws of the accused Ratan Kumar. The petitioner is in custody since 31.10.2021.

¶17

Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail, submitting that the petitioner is accomplice of the co-accused Ratan Kumar.

¶18

Having regard to the submission made hereinabove and considering the fact that except the confessional statement of co-accused Ratan Kumar, there is nothing on record against the present petitioner, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/(twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Judicial Magistrate-5th, Motihari, East Champaran/court concerned in connection with Pakridayal P.S. Case No.224 of 2021, subject to the following conditions :

¶19

(i) The bail bond of the petitioner will be accepted only after framing of charge, if not already framed.

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5306 of 2022(2) dt.09-06-2022 3/3

¶21

(ii) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, preferably one of the parents.

¶22

(iii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below.

¶23

(iv) In case of absence for three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

¶24

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)

¶25

V.K.Pandey/-

¶26

U T

Manoj Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manoj Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kunal Srivastav @ Kunal Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Laxuman Sahani Vs the State of Bihar

Mithun Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Tarique Ahmad @ Pappu Vs The State of Bihar

Rajiv Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Mandeep Yadav @ Matal Vs the State of Bihar