Allowed

Tarique Ahmad @ Pappu v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Jun 2022CR. MISC./4966/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a bail order in a criminal case involving theft under Sections 379 and 411 IPC. The court directed the release of the petitioner on bail subject to furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with sureties and specified conditions, noting that bail acceptance is conditional upon the framing of charges.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each, subject to conditions including acceptance after framing of charge.

Tarique Ahmad @ Pappu Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4966 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-292 Year-2021 Thana- AURANGABAD TOWN DistrictAurangabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Tarique Ahmad @ Pappu, Son of Md. Jamil @ Munna, Resident of MohallaNawadih, Ward No. 21, P.S. Aurangabad Town, District- Aurangabad

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shailesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 09-06-2022

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶12

Let the defect (s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

¶13

In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Aurangabad Town P.S. Case No. 292 of 2021 registered for the alleged offence under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

The allegation against the petitioner is that of stealing a motorcycle and he was apprehended with the motorcycle along with some other stolen articles.

¶15

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is a mechanic and he was called to

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4966 of 2022(2) dt.09-06-2022 2/3

¶17

unlock the motorcycle and for this purpose he went along with his instrument. He was not even arrested from the spot and he was apprehended from his house. He is in custody since 26.07.2021.

¶18

Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail, submitting that the petitioner was caught with the stolen property and some other articles.

¶19

Having regard to the submission made hereinabove and considering the period of custody, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad/court concerned in connection with Aurangabad Town P.S. Case No.292 of 2021, subject to the following conditions :

¶20

(i) The bail bond of the petitioner will be accepted only after framing of charge, if not already framed.

¶21

(ii) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, preferably one of the parents. (iii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below.

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4966 of 2022(2) dt.09-06-2022 3/3

¶23

(iv) In case of absence for three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

¶24

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)

¶25

V.K.Pandey/-

¶26

U T

Tarique Ahmad @ Pappu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tarique Ahmad @ Pappu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kunal Srivastav @ Kunal Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Laxuman Sahani Vs the State of Bihar

Mithun Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Rajiv Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Manoj Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Mandeep Yadav @ Matal Vs the State of Bihar