Om Prakash Yadav v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
The Patna High Court rejected an interim bail application pending trial. It directed the Session Judge to conclude the trial within four months, granting liberty to the petitioner to apply for bail if the timeline is not met.
What did the court decide?
Bail application rejected; liberty to file fresh bail application if trial not concluded within four months granted.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52699 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2020 Thana- NARPATGANJ District- Araria
======================================================
- Om Prakash Yadav Son Of Kewal Yadav Resident Of Village- Bela Ward No.8, P.S.- Narpatganj (Basmatiya), District- Araria.
- Kuseshwar Yadav @ Kuseshwar Kumar Yadav Son Of Kewal Yadav Resident Of Village- Bela Ward No.8, P.S.- Narpatganj (Basmatiya), District- Araria.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP
======================================================
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant interim bail to the petitioners while the trial is pending before the Trial Court?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Om Prakash Yadav
- petitioner
Kuseshwar Yadav
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court