Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ application upon submission that the impugned order was complied with; court granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the application; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3499 of 2018
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10230 of 2017
======================================================
Rohit Kumar Thakur Son of Sri Baijrangi Thakur Resident of VillageKetaribank, P.O. Gadi Bishnapur, P.S. Khaira, District- Jamui.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mrityunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey - Aag 15
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order stands complied and hence he seeks permission to withdraw the present application.
Permission is granted.
The application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-
U
Rohit Kumar Thakur
The State Of Bihar
Sr. R.K. Mahajan
Sri Arbind Kumar Verma
Sri. Vijay Kumar Himanshu
Sri. Ranjeet Paswan
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
