Petitioner sought to withdraw an anticipatory bail application under CA on 13-01-2022. Permission to withdraw was granted, resulting in the dismissal of the application as withdrawn.
Prayer to withdraw anticipatory bail application allowed. Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48371 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2021 Thana- DEO District- Aurangabad
======================================================
Anil Kumar Yadav @ Anil Kumar, Son of Uday Yadav, Resident of VillageKarmadih, Police Station- Deo, District- Aurangabad.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
ORAL ORDER
2 13-01-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner, through video conferencing, wants to withdraw the anticipatory bail application.
Prayer allowed.
The anticipatory bail application stands dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J)
amit/-
U T
Anil Kumar Yadav @ Anil Kumar
The State of Bihar
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
