Allowed

Pratap Rana @ Chhotu Singh v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Apr 2022CR. MISC./46709/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a case involving robbery and Arms Act offences. The court considered arguments regarding lack of incriminating material against the petitioner and his custody situation, ordering his release against a bail bond with sureties and conditions to appear in court.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was ordered to be released on bail by furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each.

Pratap Rana @ Chhotu Singh Vs the State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46709 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-288 Year-2019 Thana- KUDHNI District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Pratap Rana @ Chhotu Singh, S/O Sri Ashok Kumar Singh, R/O VillageBalthi Narsingh, P.S.- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶13

3 18-04-2022

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to

¶15

remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶17

The petitioner seeks regular bail, who is in custody in connection with Kurhani (Turki) P.S. Case No. 288 of 2019 for the offences punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶18

As per the prosecution case, it is alleged that on 03.05.2019 while the informant was in the process of withdrawing cash, in the meantime, one person, wearing helmet on a motorcycle came and entered into the ATM and snatched Rs.1,60,000/-. On protest by the informant, it is alleged that the

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46709 of 2021(3) dt.18-04-2022 2/4

¶20

miscreant fired from his pistol causing injury over his thigh and thereafter he fled away with the looted money and ATM card.

¶21

It is submitted on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner that the F.I.R. has been instituted against unknown person and no incriminating material has been recovered from the person or possession of this petitioner and though he is in custody since 16.01.2020, but till date he has not been put on T.I.P. It is next submitted that during the course of investigation, the petitioner was arrested in Kanti P.S. case no. 769 of 2019 on suspicion and thereafter on his own confession the name of the petitioner has been implicated in the present case and except the confession of the petitioner, there is no material, which suggest the involvement of the petitioner in the present occurrence. It is lastly submitted that investigation has already been concluded and the charge-sheet has also been submitted in this case and there is no chance of absconding of the petitioner and tampering with the evidence.

¶22

On the other hand, learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the bail application and drawn the attention of this Court towards the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, apart from his submission that he has confessed his involvement in the present occurrence.

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46709 of 2021(3) dt.18-04-2022 3/4

¶24

Having considered the submissions made on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is neither named in the F.I.R. nor any incriminating material has been recovered from his person or possession nor he was put on T.I.P. though he is in jail custody since 16.01.2020, moreover his name has come on his own confession and except the confession, no material has come even during the course of investigation, which suggest the complicity of the petitioner, apart from the fact that investigation has already been concluded and charge-sheet has also been submitted in this case, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I (West), Muzaffarpur in connection with Kurhani (Turki) P.S. Case No. 288 of 2019 subject to the condition that one of the bailors will be the close relatives of the petitioner with further conditions which are as follows:-

¶25

(i) The petitioner will cooperate in conclusion of the trial. (ii) He will remain present on each and every date of trial till disposal of the case. (iii) He will not try to tamper with the evidence or intimidate the witnesses to delay the disposal of trial. (iv) In the event of default of two consecutive dates

¶26

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46709 of 2021(3) dt.18-04-2022 4/4

¶27

without any cogent reason, his bail bonds will liable to be cancelled.

¶28

(Harish Kumar, J)

¶29

uday/-

¶30

U T

Pratap Rana @ Chhotu Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pratap Rana @ Chhotu Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjit Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Krishan Gopal Sharma @ Nandlal Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Vs the State of Bihar

Dhananjay Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Shankar Mahato Vs The State of Bihar

Shyam Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar