Allowed

Sanjay Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Dec 2022CR. MISC./45969/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants bail to the petitioner in a case involving IPC and POCSO charges. The court considered the petitioner's clean antecedents, custody period, absence of injury on the victim, and the co-accused being on bail as grounds for a lenient approach.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of similar amount upon removing defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter.

Sanjay Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45969 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-347 Year-2022 Thana- FATUA District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sanjay Kumar Son Of Raju Sah Resident Of Village - Bairiya Jolbigha, P.S.Gopalpur, Distt.- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shashtri, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 16-12-2022

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed

¶15

to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State through video conferencing.

¶17

Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case No. 347 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 354 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 8 and 10 of the POCSO Act.

¶18

Allegedly, this petitioner and co-accused Chandan Kumar who used to drive a tempo , always teased the informant’s minor daughter and also misbehaved with her when the victim was taking ride on the tempo of the accused person for the purpose of going to school and later on in following with

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45969 of 2022(2) dt.16-12-2022 2/3

¶20

the complaint filed by the informant the accused person including the petitioner were apprehended by the police and the tempo which was used by the accused persons was also seized.

¶21

The main submissions advanced by the learned counsel Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh appearing for the petitioner are that the alleged offences under Section 354 of I.P.C as well as under Sections 8/10 of POCSO Act under which the FIR has been registered, are not made out in this case, there is no independent witness in support of the allegations made in the FIR, while as per the prosecution story several persons being independent persons were stated to be present at the alleged place of occurrence. Further submission is that on the person of the victim any injury mark was not found and the petitioner has been languishing in jail since 12.05.2022 and one co-accused Chandan Kumar is on bail.

¶22

Learned APP Mr. Rajendra Singh Shashtri appearing for the State has opposed the bail prayer.

¶23

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case, considering the above submissions and mainly taking into account the petitioner’s clean antecedent and his custody period and also the defence of the petitioner as to nonavailability of any injury report of the victim, in the opinion of

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45969 of 2022(2) dt.16-12-2022 3/3

¶25

this Court a lenient approach can be taken in respect of the petitioner’s prayer, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case No. 347 of 2022.

¶26

(Shailendra Singh, J.)

¶27

murli/-

¶28

U T

Sanjay Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jokhan @ Ashok Yadav @ Jokhan Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Raju Singh @ Rajesh Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Amresh Kumar @ Girdhari Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Osim Vs the State of Bihar

MD Josim Vs the State of Bihar

Sanoj Gond Vs The State of Bihar