Allowed

Jokhan @ Ashok Yadav @ Jokhan Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Dec 2022CR. MISC./43741/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court, in a bail matter arising from FIR No. 67 of 2022 involving alleged assault and POCSO offences, released the petitioner on bail considering clean antecedents and absence of specific medical evidence, prescribing ₹10,000 plus two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each.

Jokhan @ Ashok Yadav @ Jokhan Yadav Vs The State… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43741 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-67 Year-2022 Thana- NAUHATTA District- Rohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Jokhan @ Ashok Yadav @ Jokhan Yadav Son Of Late Ram Bachan Yadav Resident Of Village - Belaunja, P.S.- Nauhatta, District - Rohtas.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shankar Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, APP ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶9

3 09-12-2022

¶10

The case is heard through video conferencing.

¶11

The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to

¶12

remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within

¶13

one month.

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

¶15

Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Nawhatta P.S. Case No. 67 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323 and 354(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the POCSO Act.

¶16

As per the prosecution, this petitioner is alleged to have assaulted the informant’s daughter and also tried to outrage her modesty.

¶17

The main submissions advanced by the learned counsel Mr. Shankar Kumar appearing for the petitioner are that

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43741 of 2022(3) dt.09-12-2022 2/2

¶19

the instant case relates to an event of simple assault and no occurrence as alleged in the FIR took place and there is no any medical evidence in support of the allegation of having bitten on the cheek of the victim by this petitioner and all the witnesses examined during the investigation are relatives and interested and the petitioner has been languishing in jail since 18.06.2022 having clean antecedent.

¶20

Learned APP Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1 appearing for the State has opposed the bail prayer.

¶21

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case, considering the above submissions and mainly the clean antecedent of the petitioner and his custody period and also the defence of the petitioner that there is no any medical evidence in support of the allegation of having bitten on the cheek of the victim by this petitioner, in the opinion of this Court a lenient approach can be taken in respect of the petitioner’s prayer, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court in connection with Nawhatta P.S. Case No. 67 of 2022.

¶22

(Shailendra Singh, J.)

¶23

sangam/- U T

Jokhan @ Ashok Yadav @ Jokhan Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jokhan @ Ashok Yadav @ Jokhan Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Prasad @ Vijay Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Sri Kant Kumar @ Srikant Kumar @ Shrikant Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Raju Singh @ Rajesh Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Amresh Kumar @ Girdhari Vs the State of Bihar

Awadhesh Kumar @ Chhotan Ram Vs The State of Bihar