Allowed

Kallu Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Feb 2022CR. MISC./44358/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an oral order, the Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner, Kallu Yadav, in a case involving illicit liquor recovery under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, directing him to furnish a surety bond with specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Kallu Yadav Vs the State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44358 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-183 Year-2021 Thana- BUXAR District- Buxar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Kallu Yadav, S/O Late Ganga Yadav, R/O Village-Chhotki Sarimpur, P.SBuxar (t), District-Buxar

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kamlesh Prasad Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Madan Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 10-02-2022 Heard the parties through video conferencing.

¶12

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

¶13

petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶14

Let the defect(s) be removed within two weeks of the

¶15

complete start of the physical Court in normal course.

¶16

The petitioner, who is in custody since 12.04.2021,

¶17

seeks regular bail in connection with Buxar (T) P.S. Case No. 183 of 2021, registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

¶18

The prosecution case, in brief, is that altogether 203.900 litres of illicit liquor was recovered near the Chhathiya Muhalla, Ganga Ghat, Buxar. Accordingly, seizure list was prepared.

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44358 of 2021(2) dt.10-02-2022 2/3

¶20

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He has clean antecedent. He further submits that co-accused Bal Bahadur Ram has already been enlarged on regular bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. Case No. 41875 of 2021 vide order dated 22.01.2022. Petitioner is the sole bread earner of the family and is in custody since 12.04.2021.

¶21

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶22

Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.D.J.-II cum Special Judge, Excise, Buxar in connection with Buxar (T) P.S. Case No. 183 of 2021, subject to the following conditions:-

¶23

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned.

¶24

(2) petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

¶25

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44358 of 2021(2) dt.10-02-2022 3/3

¶26

properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court.

¶27

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

¶28

witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

¶29

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature

¶30

of offence, after his release on bail, the trial Court shall take steps to cancel his bail bonds.

¶31

(Purnendu Singh, J)

¶32

ravishankar/-

¶33

U T

Kallu Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kallu Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Birju Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Nitish Kumar @ Jhariya @ Jharilal Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Mandal @ Vinay Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Bari @ Sanjay Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Ranjay @ Ranjay Kumar @ Ranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Surendra Paswan Vs the State of Bihar