Learned counsel, N.K. Agarwal, appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that informant is not the eye witness of the occurrence and merely, as some dispute developed out of cricket match as per F.I.R., petitioner was falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that as per para 26 of the case diary weapon of murder, which was a knife, was recovered on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused, namely, Md. Salman. It is also submitted that to make accusation more aggravated, allegation of honor killing surfaced, without any basis, which is nothing but improved version of the F.I.R. It is also submitted that the allegation as regard to assault, as per F.I.R. is appearing very much general and omnibus against this petitioner, whereas he was not amongst the co-accused persons, who advanced threat to informant. It is also submitted that petitioner was implicated in this case, being the father of the main co-accused. While concluding the argument, it has been submitted that investigation of this case is completed, for which charge-sheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.
