Allowed

Ajay Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Dec 2022CR. MISC./61187/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the petitioner arrested in an excise case for illegal possession of illicit liquor. The Court held that the chargesheet was filed and investigation completed, noting doubts about the seizure list. Bail was granted with a bond and sureties subject to CrPC conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each under Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

Ajay Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61187 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-67 Year-2022 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ajay Kumar Son Of Late Kedar Rai R/O Village- Siswa, P.S.- Raxaul, Distt.East Champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajiv Nayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 02-12-2022

¶10

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State through virtual Court proceedings.

¶11

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Excise P.S. Case No.67 of 2022 registered for the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶12

The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61187 of 2022(2) dt.02-12-2022 2/3

¶14

custody since 05.05.2022.

¶15

The allegation against the petitioner is to be in illegal possession of illicit liquor, where, there was recovery of 170 litres of illicit IMFL/country made liquor.

¶16

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that alleged recovery of illicit liquor was not made from conscious physical possession of this petitioner. It is also submitted that seizure list appears doubtful, being not supported by independent witnesses rather by Bihar Home Guard personnel. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that investigation of this case has been completed, for which, chargesheet has already been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

¶17

Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State, opposes the prayer for bail.

¶18

In view of the facts and circumstances as mentioned above as seizure list appears doubtful being not supported by independent witnesses coupled with the fact that chargesheet has already submitted, let above named petitioner directed to be released on bail in connection with Excise P.S. Case No.67 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61187 of 2022(2) dt.02-12-2022 3/3

¶20

satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise Court No.2, East Champaran, Motihari/concerned court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C.

¶21

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)

¶22

S.Tripathi/- U T

Ajay Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Purushotam Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Yadav @ Santosh Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Amarendra Upadhyay @ Amarendra Kumar Upadhyay Vs The State of Bihar

Kapil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kindev Prasad @ Kindeo Sah @ Kishandeo Prasad Vs the State of Bihar

Bhajan Paswan @ Ram Bharos Paswan Vs the State of Bihar