Allowed

Shahnawaj Mian @ Sahnaj Mian @ Shahnaj Sheikh @ Shahnawaj Parwej v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Feb 2022CR. MISC./42278/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner of a robbery case sought regular bail. The High Court granted bail, noting the victim did not identify him in the T.I.P., his custody duration, trial delay due to the pandemic, and bail granted to a similarly situated co-accused.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on regular bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of like amount to the CJM, West Champaran.

Shahnawaj Mian @ Sahnaj Mian @ Shahnaj Sheikh @ Shahnawaj… — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42278 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-189 Year-2020 Thana- GOPALPUR District- West Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SHAHNAWAJ MIAN @ SAHNAJ MIAN @ SHAHNAJ SHEIKH @ SHAHNAWAJ PARWEJ Son of Parwej Alam @ Tuntun Resident of Village - Bela Sheikhtoli, Ward No.09, P.S.- Ramgarhwa, Distt.- East Champaran.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Nafisuzzoha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Aslam Ansari ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 09-02-2022

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

¶12

Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 189 of 2020 registered for the offence under Section 392 of the I.P.C.

¶13

As per the First Information Report lodged by the owner of the tractor stating therein that his driver Madhai Manjhi was coming back to his home was accosted by four unknown miscreants, who assaulted the driver of the informant and fled away with the tractor.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the First Information Report and he has been implicated in this case on the basis of confessional

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42278 of 2021(3) dt.09-02-2022 2/3

¶16

statement made by the co-accused / Jahangir Alam and Ram Lal Sah. He further submits that the looted tractor was not recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel referring to paragraph no. 3 of the supplementary affidavit submits that the petitioner was put on Test Identification Parade but the driver of the informant did not identify the petitioner which would be evident from perusal of Annexure- 2 to the supplementary affidavit. The petitioner is in custody since 19 / 02 / 2021 , charge sheet has already been submitted and trial is not likely to be concluded in near future. He next submits that similarly situated co-accused / Ishlam Ansari has been granted bail by this court in Cr. Misc. No. 40417 of 2021.

¶17

Regard being had to the submissions made by the parties and taking into consideration the materials available on record, the fact that driver of the tractor did not identify the petitioner in the Test Identification Parade, he is in custody since 19 / 02 / 2021, charge sheet has already been submitted, similarly situated co-accused has been granted bail by this court and trial is not likely to be concluded in near future due to Covid 19 pandemic, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

¶18

Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42278 of 2021(3) dt.09-02-2022 3/3

¶20

released on regular bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20000/(twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., West Champaran, Bettiah in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 189 of 2020 on the following condition:-

¶21

(i) that the petitioner shall remain present

¶22

on each and every date during the course of trial and in case of default on two consecutive dates on the part of the petitioner, his bail bond shall liable to be cancelled.

¶23

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)

¶24

praful/-

¶25

U T

Shahnawaj Mian @ Sahnaj Mian @ Shahnaj Sheikh @ Shahnawaj Parwej v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shahnawaj Mian @ Sahnaj Mian @ Shahnaj Sheikh @ Shahnawaj Parwej v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prabhu Yadav @ Lambu Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Suraj Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Raja Yadav @ Prince Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dhirendra Singh @ Duldul Singh @ Birendra Singh Vs The State of Bihar

The Union of India through Dhiraj Kumar Intelligence Officer Vs Mahendra Saw

Sana Ahmad Vs The State of Bihar