Dismissed

Sana Ahmad v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Feb 2022CR. MISC./41682/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Miscellaneous petition seeking cancellation of bail granted to a defendant due to alleged violation of a monetary condition. The court acknowledged COVID-19 difficulties but rejected the cancellation petition, ordering future compliance with bail conditions.

What did the court decide?

The petition for cancellation of bail stands disposed of without interference; OP No. 2 directed to abide by bail conditions.

Sana Ahmad Vs The State of Bihar — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41682 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-393 Year-2017 Thana- BUDDHACOLONY District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SANA AHMAD W/o Md. Johaib Malik, D/o Sarfaraj Ahmad Resident of Village - Flat no.11, Kaithma Apartment, Raiji Ki Gali, Boring Cdanal Road, P.S.- Buddha Colony, Distt.- Patna. Permanent Resident of Village - Manjhour, P.S.- Makhudmpur, Dist.- Jehanabad.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Md. Johaib Mallik Son of Khurshid Mallik Resident of Village - Dani Bigha, P.S.- Makhdumpur, Distt.- Jehanabad at Present resident of Second Floor Flat No.206, Building No.6/G Roma Banjara Tanda Cooperative Society Infront of Agarwal Tower, P.M.C.P. Road Juni, Mumbai, P.S.- Mankhurd, Distt.- Mumbai, Maharastra.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr Arvind Mouar, Adv. Mr. Raj Krishan Jha, Adv. For the State : Mr. Md. Anbzarul Haque Sahara, APP For the Opposite Party No.2: Mr. Suresh Mishra, Adv. ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶12

5 09-02-2022 Heard the parties through virtual mode.

¶13

The present application has been filed for

¶14

cancellation of bail granted to OP No.2, Md. Johaib Mallik in Cr. Misc. No. 74377/2018 vide order dated 20.08.2019 on the ground that OP No.2 has violated the condition of bail by not paying a sum of Rs. 12,000/- per month to the petitioner/informant which is one of the conditions of bail.

¶15

Learned counsel appearing for OP No.2 submits that petitioner has been working as Chartered Accountant in Mumbai but due to COVID-19 pandemic, the OP No.2 has some

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41682 of 2021(5) dt.09-02-2022 2/2

¶17

difficulty in making payment inasmuch as his job got affected, however, he submits that payment for a period of three months has been made and credited in the account of petitioner. He next submits that the balance amount of arrears of payment and the current payment shall be made by the OP No.2 in favour of petitioner @ 12,000/- per month within the period of eight months from today in installments.

¶18

In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the OP No.2, I am not inclined to interfere the order granting bail to OP No.2 at this stage. This Court hope and trust that the OP No.2 shall abide by the conditions of bail in future.

¶19

Accordingly, this petition for cancellation of bail stands disposed of.

¶20

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)

¶21

perwez

¶22

U T

Sana Ahmad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sana Ahmad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prabhu Yadav @ Lambu Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Suraj Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Raja Yadav @ Prince Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dhirendra Singh @ Duldul Singh @ Birendra Singh Vs The State of Bihar

The Union of India through Dhiraj Kumar Intelligence Officer Vs Mahendra Saw

Shahnawaj Mian @ Sahnaj Mian @ Shahnaj Sheikh @ Shahnawaj Parwej Vs the State of Bihar