Allowed

Shami Anwar @ Sunny v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Sept 2022CR. MISC./4009/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest in a dowry torture case involving Sections 498A and others, permitting surrender within four weeks subject to specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on surrendering within four weeks, furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. conditions.

Shami Anwar @ Sunny Vs the State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4009 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-227 Year-2019 Thana- KOCHADHAMAN District- Kishanganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SHAMI ANWAR @ SUNNY Son of Anwar Alam Resident of Bishanpur, P.S.- Kochadhamn (Bishanpur O.P.), Distt - Kishanganj.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

THE STATE OF BIHAR

¶8

Tripti Kumari @ Tarannum Parween Wife of Shami Anwar @ Sunny Resident of Bishanpur, P.S.- Kochadhaman (Bishanpur O.P.), Distt - Kishanganj. At present D/o Ajay Kumar Choudhary Resident of Satti Chaura, P.S.- Balia, Distt - Begusarai.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amal Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Manoj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 06-09-2022

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

¶13

counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State.

¶14

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been

¶15

filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Kochadhaman (Bishanpur O.P.) P.S. Case no. 227 of 2019 instituted for the offence under Sections 498A, 313, 371, 372, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner along with his family members has tortured the informant in various ways due to non-fulfillment of dowry demand.

¶17

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is husband of the informant. After

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4009 of 2020(4) dt.06-09-2022 2/2

¶19

prevailing good sense, both parties are leading their conjugal life happily together and the matter has been compromised between them.

¶20

Learned counsel appearing for both the parties have jointly asserted that no dispute remained between the petitioner and the informant. Both are living happily together.

¶21

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Kochadhaman (Bishanpur O.P.) P.S. Case no. 227 of 2019, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Kishanganj subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶22

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶23

sushma/- U

Shami Anwar @ Sunny v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shami Anwar @ Sunny v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Devi Soren Vs The State of Bihar

Mintu Kuar @ Mintu Kumar Gupta @ Mintu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Akash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Kumar @ Lavkesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Shiv Narayan Yadav @ Shibu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjan Singh @ Ranjan Kumar Vs the State of Bihar