Allowed

Dinesh Kumar Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Jan 2022CR. MISC./39935/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order grants anticipatory bail to three petitioners in a criminal complaint case due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The court directs release on personal bond subject to furnishing surety bonds once normalcy is restored.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners to be released on anticipatory bail on personal bond; to furnish bail bonds with two sureties upon restoration of normalcy.

Dinesh Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39935 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-223 Year-2020 Thana- PANCHRUKHI District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

DINESH KUMAR YADAV S/o Suresh Yadav @ Suresh Choudhary R/o village- Phalpura, P.S. G.B. Nagar (Tarwara), District - Siwan.

¶5

Rajesh Kumar S/O Suresh Yadav @ Suresh Choudhary R/o villagePhalpura, P.S. G.B. Nagar (Tarwara), District - Siwan.

¶6

Suresh Yadav @ Suresh Choudhary S/o Late Brahma Yadav R/o villagePhalpura, P.S. G.B. Nagar (Tarwara), District - Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Udit Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dr. Ajeet Kumar ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 06-01-2022 Due to the third wave of COVID-19 Pandemic, the

¶14

matter is being taken up by way of virtual Court proceeding.

¶15

The matter has been listed under the heading “For Orders” under the orders of Hon’ble the Chief Justice.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks after restoration of normalcy.

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State through virtual mode.

¶18

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in Pachrukhi P.S. Case No. 223 of 2020 registered under Sections 341, 323,

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39935 of 2021(2) dt.06-01-2022 2/3

¶20

324, 325, 379, 307, 353, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶21

Allegedly, petitioners and others snatched notice of Section-107 Cr.P.C. from hand of informant. The accused persons assaulted the informant and caught the hair of informant’s wife and dragged her.

¶22

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioner Nos. 2 & 3 have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. The nature of injury is said to be simple. From perusal of the order of learned Sessions court, it appears that the informant has appeared in the court below and has retracted from his earlier statement made in the FIR.

¶23

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

¶24

It is necessary to indicate here that this Court while considering the prayer made in the present anticipatory bail application has taken note of the exponential rise in number of covid cases due to outbreak of third wave of Covid-19 pandemic. Further this Court can also not lose sight of the fact that the condition of jails is not conducive and suitable to the present situation which has arisen due to the sudden rise in

¶25

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39935 of 2021(2) dt.06-01-2022 3/3

¶26

covid cases.

¶27

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on their personal bond to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Siwan in connection with Pachrukhi P.S. Case No. 223 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶28

Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioners shall furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

¶29

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶30

A.K.V.//-

¶31

U T

Dinesh Kumar Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh Kumar Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ompraksh @ Jyoti Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Kamal Sah @ Kamal Sahu Vs the State of Bihar

Deepak Manjhi Vs the State of Bihar

Ashok Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Afaroj @ Md. Afaroj Vs The State of Bihar

Shankar Ray @ Shiv Shankar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar