Allowed

Afaroj @ Md. Afaroj v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Jan 2022CR. MISC./32248/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge oral order grants anticipatory bail to the petitioner in an FIR alleging armed firing at police. The Court directs defect removal within four weeks and release on personal bonds, with a subsequent requirement for monetary bail upon restoration of normalcy.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted release on anticipatory bail on personal bonds; directed to remove defects within four weeks and furnish monetary bail with sureties within eight weeks after normalcy.

Afaroj @ Md. Afaroj Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32248 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-341 Year-2020 Thana- SAUR BAZAR District- Saharsa

¶3

======================================================

¶4

AFAROJ @ MD. AFAROJ Son of Shahabaj Resident of Village - Patarghat, P.S.- Sour Bazar (Patarghat O.P.), District - Saharsa (Bihar)

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anant Kumar 1 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 06-01-2022

¶13

Due to the third wave of COVID-19 Pandemic, the

¶14

matter is being taken up by way of Virtual Court proceeding.

¶15

The matter has been listed under the heading ‘For Orders’ under the orders of Hon’ble the Chief Justice.

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of four weeks after restoration of normalcy.

¶18

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 307, 327, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of Arms Act.

¶19

The prosecution allegation, in short, is that when the police reached the place of occurrence, the accused persons,

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32248 of 2021(2) dt.06-01-2022 2/3

¶21

variously armed, fired at the police party.

¶22

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. General and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. No specific overt act is alleged against the petitioner. A scuffle is said to have taken place between the police party and the local residents. No injury is said to have been caused in course of the occurrence to prosecution side.

¶23

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶24

It is necessary to indicate here that this Court while considering the prayer made in the present anticipatory bail application has taken note of the exponential rise in number of covid cases due to outbreak of third wave of Covid-19 pandemic. Further this Court can also not lose sight of the fact that the condition of jails is not conducive and suitable to the present situation which has arisen due to the sudden rise in covid cases.

¶25

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before

¶26

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32248 of 2021(2) dt.06-01-2022 3/3

¶27

the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his personal bonds to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Sour Bazar (Patarghat O.P.) P.S. Case No. 341/2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶28

Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight weeks to the satisfaction of the Court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

¶29

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶30

Pankaj/-

¶31

U T

Afaroj @ Md. Afaroj v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Afaroj @ Md. Afaroj v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ompraksh @ Jyoti Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Kamal Sah @ Kamal Sahu Vs the State of Bihar

Deepak Manjhi Vs the State of Bihar

Ashok Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Dinesh Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Shankar Ray @ Shiv Shankar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar