Allowed

Ramesh Kumar @ Ramesh Sah v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC7 Apr 2022CR. MISC./39864/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted regular bail to Ramesh Kumar in an excise case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The court ordered bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Excise, Muzaffarpur.

Ramesh Kumar @ Ramesh Sah Vs the State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39864 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-304 Year-2020 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAMESH KUMAR @ RAMESH SAH Son of Jaynarayan Sah Resident of village - Muraul, P.S. Maniyari, District - Muzaffarpur.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Chandra Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶8

7 07-04-2022

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶10

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant

¶11

of regular bail in a case registered under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶12

As per the prosecution case, 111.75 litres of liquor was recovered from a hut belonging to the petitioner.

¶13

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no incriminating article has been recovered from the petitioner’s possession. He has been falsely implicated in the case. He is in custody since 25.3.2021.

¶14

It is submitted that the petitioner has antecedent under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Pursuant to the order of this Court a sum of Rs. 10,000/- has been deposited

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39864 of 2021(7) dt.07-04-2022 2/2

¶16

with the Patna High Court Legal Services Committee vide receipt no. 1331 dated 30.3.2022. A supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner not being on record, the filing of the original affidavit is accepted and taken on record.

¶17

Heard learned APP for the State.

¶18

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts of the case specially the petitioner having remained in custody for more than 1 year, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Excise Case no. 304 of 2020 (arising out of P.R. no. 2 of 2020) on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Excise, Muzaffarpur.

¶19

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶20

Spd/-

¶21

U T

Ramesh Kumar @ Ramesh Sah v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh Kumar @ Ramesh Sah v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shiv Pukar Mahto @ Shiv Kumar Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Raja Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Naresh Sharma @ Naresh Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Mritunjay Singh @ Mritunjay Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna

Rishu Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Nawal Kishor Azad Vs The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary Government of Bihar