Allowed

Rishu Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC7 Apr 2022CR. MISC./36583/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an oral order, the Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner who had been in custody for over a year in a case involving offenses under Section 307, 323, 324, 379, and 504 IPC, directing him to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Rishu Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36583 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-239 Year-2020 Thana- KUCHAIKOTE District- Gopalganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RISHU KUMAR S/O LATE SANTOSH SINGH R/O VILLAGE BAKHRI, P.S. KUCHAIKOT, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vishwajeet Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pushpa Sinha 1, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 07-04-2022

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶13

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant

¶14

of regular bail in a case registered under sections 307, 323, 324, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

As per the prosecution case, as a result of altercation between the parties it is stated that the five accused persons including the petitioner came variously armed and the petitioner is said to have given a tangi blow on the head of the son of the informant causing serious injuries.

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The parties being neighbours, there was differences between the parties, however, the manner of occurrence is other than what has been narrated in the FIR. The petitioner has remained in custody since 17.3.2021 and has no criminal antecedent.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36583 of 2021(3) dt.07-04-2022 2/2

¶18

Chargesheet has been submitted in the case.

¶19

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for

¶20

the State who submits that the injuries on the son of the informant attributed to this petitioner has been found to be grievous in nature.

¶21

In response it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the allegations in the FIR are not supported by the injury report in so far as the cause of injury is said to be by hard and blunt object.

¶22

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts of the case, the petitioner having remained in custody for more than 1 year and chargesheet having been submitted in the case, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Kuchaikote P.S. Case no. 239 of 2020 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj.

¶23

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶24

Spd/-

¶25

U T

Rishu Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rishu Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shiv Pukar Mahto @ Shiv Kumar Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Raja Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Naresh Sharma @ Naresh Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Mritunjay Singh @ Mritunjay Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna

Ramesh Kumar @ Ramesh Sah Vs the State of Bihar

Nawal Kishor Azad Vs The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary Government of Bihar