Allowed

Manegar Yadav @ Mainejar Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Aug 2022CR. MISC./3779/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to two farmers facing charges under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act regarding alleged recovery of urea bags, directing surrender within four weeks with a bail bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners enlarged on bail upon surrender within four weeks, furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties.

Manegar Yadav @ Mainejar Yadav Vs the State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3779 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-208 Year-2021 Thana- LAURIA District- West Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MANEGAR YADAV @ MAINEJAR YADAV Son of Harendra Yadav Resident of Village- Makari Tola, Ward No.2, Police Station- Lauriya, District- West Champaran.

¶5

Rajan Kumar @ Rajan Kumar Gupta Son of Ramnath Sah Resident of Village- Makari Tola, Ward No.2, Police Station- Lauriya, District- West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anant Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.A.PP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 03-08-2022

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

¶13

learned APP for the State.

¶14

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Lauriya P.S. Case no. 208 of 2021 instituted for the offence under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act 1955.

¶15

Prosecution case relates to recovery of 20 bags urea from the house of the petitioners.

¶16

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and has committed no offence. They are farmer by profession and they have purchased the said fertilizers for use in agriculture in their field.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3779 of 2022(2) dt.03-08-2022 2/2

¶18

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

¶19

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Lauriya P.S. Case no. 208 of 2021 , they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge 1^st , Bettiah, West Champaran subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶20

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶21

sushma/-

¶22

Manegar Yadav @ Mainejar Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manegar Yadav @ Mainejar Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Kumar @ Began Vs The State of Bihar

Anwar Ali @ Sonu Ali @ Sonu Vs The State of Bihar

Bachhi Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Golu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Butiya Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Sonali Kumari Vs The State of Bihar