Allowed

Ashok Kumar @ Began v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Aug 2022CR. MISC./2679/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners in case of offences under Sections 413 and 414 IPC. The court held them to be released on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Release on anticipatory bail by furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of like amount to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj.

Ashok Kumar @ Began Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2679 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-113 Year-2019 Thana- BIKRAMGANJ District- Rohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ashok Kumar @ Began S/o Sri Mahendra Prasad Resident of atBikramganj, P.O. and P.S.- Bikaramganj, District- Rohtas

¶5

Sanjeev Kumar s/o Binod Prasad Resident of at- Bikramganj, P.O. and P.S.Bikaramganj, District- Rohtas

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Binod Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 02-08-2022

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

¶13

learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under

¶15

Section 413, 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

The prosecution case as per F.I.R is that the

¶17

informant being Sub-Inspector received an information

¶18

that a stolen Scorpio vehicle is coming from Ara side in

¶19

which co-accused Kundan Kumar and his associates are

¶20

sitting who are trying to sell the said vehicle. The said

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2679 of 2022(2) dt.02-08-2022 2/3

¶22

vehicle was stopped. Three persons were sitting in the vehicle. When the documents with regard to the vehicle

¶23

in question were demanded, the same could not be produced.

¶24

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are not named in the F.I.R and their names sprang up on the confessional statement of co-accused Kundan Kumar. The petitioners have no concern either with the alleged seized vehicle or the apprehended accused persons.

¶25

In the facts and circumstance of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousands)

¶26

each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj at Rohtas in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 113 of 2019, subject to the

¶27

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2679 of 2022(2) dt.02-08-2022 3/3

¶28

conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the

¶29

Cr.P.C.

¶30

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶31

Shageer/-

¶32

U T

Ashok Kumar @ Began v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Kumar @ Began v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikas Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ramji Singh @ Ramji Paneri Vs The State of Bihar

Rama Shankar Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Anwar Ali @ Sonu Ali @ Sonu Vs The State of Bihar

Bachhi Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Mohan Kumar @ Guddu Vs The State of Bihar