Petitioners sought regular bail in a cheating case involving public funds via online marketing. The High Court allowed bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000 with sureties.
Allowance of regular bail on Rs. 20,000 bond with two sureties, conditional upon physical appearance before the lower court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37404 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-99 Year-2022 Thana- GRIYAK District- Nalanda
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sudish Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Bishweshwar Ram
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH
ORAL ORDER
2 29-09-2022
Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 419, 420, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code and section 66C, 66D of I.T. Act.
As per the prosecution case, the petitioners and the co-accused persons are alleged to have indulged in cheating money of public in the name of online marketing.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37404 of 2022(2) dt.29-09-2022 2/2
the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioners are in custody since 05.03.2022.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioners.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioners above-named, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court concerned Nalanda at Biharsharif, in connection with Giriyak (Katrisarai) P.S. Case No. 99 of 2022, with a condition:-
1.The petitioners are directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioners is liable to be cancelled. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)
niku/- U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to be enlarged on bail in the ongoing case?
6 provisions across 2 enactments
Tejal Kumar
Deepak Kumar @ Aditya Kumar
The State of Bihar
Chandra Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
