Petitioner sought permission to withdraw Criminal Miscellaneous application citing arrest making it infructuous. Court dismissed the application on withdrawal grounds without substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37374 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2019 Thana- SANJHOLI District- Rohtas
======================================================
Satendar Singh S/o Sadhu Saran Singh R/o village- Bensagar, P.S.- Karakat, District- Rohtas.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kameshwar Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Renu Kumari, APP.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 25-03-2022 At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner
seeks permission to withdraw the present application as the petitioner has been arrested and the same has become infructuous.
It is, thus, dismissed as withdrawn as having become infructuous.
(Sandeep Kumar, J.)
Shakir /-
U T
Satendar Singh
The State of Bihar
Surendar Singh
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
