Allowed

Kumar Neelamani v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Mar 2022CR. MISC./23208/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous application arising from a complaint case, the Single Judge allowed the petitioner's bail by recording a compromise. The petitioner agreed to pay Rs. 15 lakhs to the wife for settlement and divorce. The petitioner was directed to surrender and execute a bail bond, while the principal judge of the Family Court was directed to expedite divorce proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Provisional bail granted on surrender and execution of bond; directive to Family Court to expedite divorce; full settlement amount agreed to.

Kumar Neelamani Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23208 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1067 Year-2019 Thana- MUZFFARPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Kumar Neelamani Son of Sri Anil Singh Resident of Village- Chainpur, P.O.Damodarpur, P.S.- Kanti, District- Muzaffarpur, State- Bihar.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Ritika Kumari Wife of Kumar Neelamani, Daughter of Deenanath Mishra Resident of Village- Near Tagore Public School Gobarsahi, P.S.- Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Gyan Abhinav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP For Opp. Party No.2 : Mr. Hari Kishore Thakur, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

6 24-03-2022 Heard the parties.

¶12

The petitioner, opposite party no.2, father, mother

¶13

and brother of opposite party no.2 are present in Court and after discussions, they have entered into compromise and as a measure of one time settlement, the petitioner and his father have agreed to pay Rs.15,00,000/- (Rupees fifteen lakhs) to opposite party no.2 as full and final settlement of the dispute between the parties.

¶14

The petitioner will surrender in the court below and execute the bail bond within two weeks from today along with demand draft in the name of opposite party no.2. On furnishing

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23208 of 2021(6) dt.24-03-2022 2/3

¶16

demand draft, the petitioner shall be released on provisional bail by the court below on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of Sri Deepak Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Muzaffarpur in connection with Complaint Case No. 1067 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Code.

¶17

Demand draft of Rs.5,00,000/- will be handed over to the opposite party no.2 by the court below. Balance amount of Rs.10,00,000/- shall be paid to the opposite party no.2 during the pendency of the divorce proceeding. Second installment of Rs.5,00,000/- shall be paid by the petitioner to the opposite party no.2 at the time of first motion and balance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- shall be paid by the petitioner to opposite party no.2 at the time of second motion. In case the petitioner and opposite party no.2 want waiver of the mandatory period of six months for grant of divorce by mutual consent, they can do so after filing an application in the family court.

¶18

The Principal Judge, Family Court, Muzaffarpur shall expedite the divorce proceeding as soon as it is filed and will abide by the direction given in this order. If the entire amount is handed over to the opposite party no.2 by the court below as and

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23208 of 2021(6) dt.24-03-2022 3/3

¶20

when it is deposited by the parties in the criminal proceeding or in divorce proceeding, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner shall be confirmed.

¶21

Education certificates of the opposite party no.2 which are lying with the petitioner in his house shall be returned by the petitioner’s family to opposite party no.2 or her father.

¶22

With the aforesaid observation and direction, this application is allowed.

¶23

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶24

BT/-

¶25

U T

Kumar Neelamani v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kumar Neelamani v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Umesh Prasad Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Jalil @ Md. Jalil Vs The State of Bihar

Sarswati Devi Vs The State of Bihar

MD Nasrullah Vs The State of Bihar

Rambeer Kumar Ram Vs the State of Bihar

Bablu Kumar @ Bablu Sahni Vs the State of Bihar