Allowed

Narendra Kumar @ Niranjan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Apr 2022CR. MISC./36937/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted regular bail to the petitioner in a case concerning alleged liquor smuggling under sections 272, 273 of IPC and section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, after he had been in custody for one year.

What did the court decide?

Directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Narendra Kumar @ Niranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36937 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-142 Year-2020 Thana- BIBHUTIPUR District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

NARENDRA KUMAR @ NIRANJAN KUMAR Son of Late Ganga Prasad Singh Resident of - Kodariya, Ward No. 1, P.S.- Bibhutipur, DistrictSamastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prahalad Kumar Bhagat, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Md. Aslam Ansari, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 19-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶12

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant

¶13

of regular bail in a case registered under sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶14

As per the prosecution case, 250.395 litres of liquor was recovered from the premises belonging to this petitioner.

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. No incriminating article has been recovered from his possession. The alleged place of recovery is an open place accessible to all. The cause of false implication of the petitioner is his antecedents. He is in custody since 19.4.2021.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36937 of 2021(3) dt.19-04-2022 2/2

¶17

Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶18

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts of the case specially the petitioner having remained in custody for 1 year, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Bibhutipur P.S. Case no.142 of 2020 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 2^nd Additional District Judge-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Samastipur.

¶19

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶20

Saurabh/-

¶21

U T

Narendra Kumar @ Niranjan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Narendra Kumar @ Niranjan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jandan Das @ Yadunandan Das Vs The State of Bihar

Vipin Mahto @ Jhingwa Vs The State of Bihar

Birendra Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Dharmbir Singh @ Bablu Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjit Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Kabita Devi @ Kavita Devi @ Kabita @ Kavita Rani Vs The State of Bihar