Kunwar Jha v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
The Patna High Court rejected the petitioner's prayer for anticipatory bail in proceedings under the Bihar Excise Prohibition Amended Act, 2016, as recovery was made from his motorcycle.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for anticipatory bail was rejected.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36700 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-128 Year-2021 Thana- SAMASTIPUR MUFFASIL DistrictSamastipur
======================================================
KUNWAR JHA SON OF LATE RAM NARAYAN JHA Resident of Village - Siluth, P.S.- Samastipur (Mufassil), Distt.- Samastipur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER
2 03-03-2022
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner apprehending arrest in an excise offence case.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kunwar Jha
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Sunil Kumar Panwar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court