Allowed

Vimal Kumar @ Vimal Mahto @ Lohwa v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Dec 2022CR. MISC./33339/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application in an FIR registered for offences under Sections 307, 120(B), 34 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act, the High Court of Patna held that since the allegation of firing was not specific against the petitioner and implication appeared to be based on suspicion, and as the charge-sheet had been submitted, bail was granted on furnishing a bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was directed to be released on bail in FIR No. 159 of 2015 by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each.

Vimal Kumar @ Vimal Mahto @ Lohwa Vs The State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33339 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-159 Year-2015 Thana- PIRPAINTI District- Bhagalpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Vimal Kumar @ Vimal Mahto @ Lohwa Son of Late Tarni Mahto Resident Of Village- Maheshmunda, P.S.- Kahalgaon, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 20-12-2022

¶13

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶14

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

¶15

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Pirpainty P.S. Case No. 159 of 2015 registered for the offence under Sections 307, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶16

The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 04.10.2021.

¶17

The allegation against the petitioner is to cause fire arm injuries to the informant/injured, alongwith other coaccused persons, while roaming in Pirpainty Bazar together.

¶18

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33339 of 2022(3) dt.20-12-2022 2/3

¶20

submitted that entire allegation is based upon suspicion, as petitioner alongwith other co-accused persons accompanied the informant/injured as a friend. It is also submitted as petitioner left place of occurrence out of fear, he has been falsely implicated in present case, without having any connecting evidence. It is also submitted that allegation of firing is not specific against this petitioner and he has implicated in present case only due to his criminal antecedents, as same is of 11 cases, where he has already acquitted in 2 cases and on bail in rest of 9 cases, where in maximum of cases, his name surfaced either on the basis of confessional statement or on the basis of suspicion, as of the present case. While concluding the argument, it has been submitted that investigation has been completed, for which, charge-sheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

¶21

Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

¶22

Considering the facts and circumstances as mentioned above, as allegation of firing is not specifically available against this petitioner, where implication appears to be based upon suspicion coupled with the fact that charge-sheet has been submitted, let the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Pirpainty P.S. Case No. 159

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33339 of 2022(3) dt.20-12-2022 3/3

¶24

of 2015 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-XI, Bhagalpur/concerned court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 437 (3) of the Cr.P.C.

¶25

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)

¶26

pooja/-

¶27

U T

Vimal Kumar @ Vimal Mahto @ Lohwa v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vimal Kumar @ Vimal Mahto @ Lohwa v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikash Chaubey @ Vikash Ranjan Vs The State of Bihar

Mahanth Rajkeshwar Bharti Vs The State of Bihar

Amarjeet Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Rakesh Pandey @ Rakesh Kumar Pandey Vs the State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjeet Kumar @ Pallu @ Pallu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar