Allowed

Mahanth Rajkeshwar Bharti v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Dec 2022CR. MISC./43977/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused of cheating and forgery. The court noted the existence of a pending civil dispute regarding Mahanthship and the submission of a charge-sheet allowing the petitioner's release on a bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Directed release on bail of the petitioner on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties under Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

Mahanth Rajkeshwar Bharti Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43977 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2022 Thana- DURAULI District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Mahanth Rajkeshwar Bharti Chela of Late Mahanth Chandrashekhar Bharti R/o village- Dow Buzurg Tola Mathiya, P.S.- Darauli, District- Siwan, (Accused as Musafir Rai @ Mahanth Singh, S/o Jageshwar Rai, R/o villageSarana Tola Bacha Rai, P.S.- Darauli, District- Siwan)

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Kant Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Md. Shakir Ahmad, APP For the Informant : Mr. Ram Binod Singh, Advocate ======================================================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶8

3 15-12-2022

¶9

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

¶10

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

¶11

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Darauli P.S. Case No. 79 of 2022 registered for the offence under Sections 468 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 04.06.2022.

¶13

The allegation against the petitioner is to cheat informant by creating forged and fabricated document.

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43977 of 2022(3) dt.15-12-2022 2/3

¶15

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that, admittedly, the present prosecution appears to create a legal pressure on the petitioner to compromise the civil dispute pending between the parties before the learned Trial Court, Siwan. It is further submitted that matter is purely arises out of civil disputes, lasting since 1960, to get the Mahanthship of “Don” Math. It is also submitted that petitioner is otherwise man of clean antecedent, whereas he was found involved in two criminal cases instituted at the instance of the informant, regarding harvesting of crops within the premises of the “Don” Math. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that investigation in this case is complete for which chargesheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

¶16

Learned APP duly assisted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant, while opposing the prayer of bail, fairly conceded the fact that civil dipute is pending between the parties. It is submitted that petitioner created a forged document, as regard to his name and address, to grab the property of the informant.

¶17

In view of the facts and circumstances, as mentioned above, as, admittedly, civil dispute is pending between the

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43977 of 2022(3) dt.15-12-2022 3/3

¶19

parties, deciding their rights coupled with the fact that chargesheet has been submitted, where petitioner is in custody since 04.06.2022, let the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Darauli P.S. Case No. 79 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Siwan/concerned Court, subject to the conditions as laid down u/s 437(3) of the Cr.P.C.

¶20

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)

¶21

Ankit/-

¶22

U T

Mahanth Rajkeshwar Bharti v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahanth Rajkeshwar Bharti v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pankaj Kumar @ Pankaj Kmar Vs The State of Bihar

Sandeep Kumar @ Hanumanma Vs The State of Bihar

Dhaneswar Kora Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Chaubey @ Vikash Ranjan Vs The State of Bihar

Amarjeet Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Akhilesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar