Allowed

Kundan Kumar @ Awadhesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Feb 2022CR. MISC./30918/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In two criminal miscellaneous matters arising from the same police case, the petitioner sought permission to withdraw bail applications. The High Court granted permission to withdraw the applications with liberty to renew the prayer for bail after six months, dismissing the applications as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw bail applications with liberty to renew the prayer for bail after six months from today.

Kundan Kumar @ Awadhesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Quashing and FIR | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30918 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-333 Year-2020 Thana- LAHERIMUHALLA District- Nalanda

¶3

====================================================== KUNDAN KUMAR @ AWADHESH KUMAR S/o Sahdev Yadav R/o Mohalla- Gadhpar, Deklulidhar, District- Bihar, District- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶8

======================================================

¶9

with

¶10

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 69195 of 2021

¶11

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-333 Year-2020 Thana- LAHERIMUHALLA District- Nalanda

¶12

====================================================== VIKKY KUMAR @ BHONDU @ VICKKY KUMAR @ BHOUDY MOTU Son of Late Umesh Manjhi Resident of Village- Dhujji Tola Bhangidih, P.S.Sherghati, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶17

====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 30918 of 2021) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Raj Kishor Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 69195 of 2021) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Braj Kishore Pd.(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA

¶18

ORAL ORDER

¶19

4 22-02-2022

¶20

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State, in both the cases.

¶21

After some arguments, when this Court was not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners, learned Counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw these applications with

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30918 of 2021(4) dt.22-02-2022 2/2

¶23

liberty to renew the prayer for bail after six months from today.

¶24

Permission is granted.

¶25

These applications are dismissed as withdrawn,

¶26

with the liberty aforesaid.

¶27

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.)

¶28

Prabhakar Anand/-

¶29

U √ T √

Kundan Kumar @ Awadhesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kundan Kumar @ Awadhesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Jitan Mandal Vs the State of Bihar

Hirdev Singh @ Hardev Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Sajjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Madan Jindal Vs The State of Bihar

Sohan Rai @ Sohan Gope Vs The State of Bihar