Allowed

Vinod @ Vinod Kumar Kali @ Vinod Kali @ Vinod Kali Rakhna v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC26 Aug 2022CR. MISC./30757/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice Arun Kumar Jha granted bail to a petitioner accused of cheating and smuggling illicit liquor, directed release on a bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties after verifying charge sheet status and custody period.

What did the court decide?

Directed petitioner to be released on bail by furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, Excise Court No. 2, Muzaffarpur.

Vinod @ Vinod Kumar Kali @ Vinod Kali @ Vinod Kali Rakhna Vs… — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30757 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-750 Year-2020 Thana- KANTI District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Vinod @ Vinod Kumar Kali @ Vinod Kali @ Vinod Kali Rakhna, S/o Deevan @ Deewan Singh, R/o House No. 1766, Dinod, P.S.- Sadar Bhiwani, DistrictBhiwani (Haryana)

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mukesh Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rajiv Nayan, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 26-08-2022

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

A.P.P. for the State through video conferencing.

¶14

Let the defect(s), if any, as pointed out by the office be removed within four weeks from the date of resumption of physical filing and physical removal of defect.

¶15

In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No. 750 of 2020 registered for the alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶16

As per the prosecution case, the police started checking of vehicles on receiving secret information that a huge quantity of illicit India made foreign liquor concealed in paddy

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30757 of 2022(2) dt.26-08-2022 2/4

¶18

husk on a truck was being taken towards Darbhanga. The truck was intercepted. During search, two co-accused persons were arrested, who named this petitioner who has supplied the liquor to them. Recovery of 2516.400 litres of India made foreign liquor was made from the truck.

¶19

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the co-accused named one Vinod Kali Rakhna without any parentage, but it is not clear how the petitioner was named for his involvement in the case by the police. The mobile number said to be belonging to this petitioner is not the mobile number of this petitioner and even the truck from which the recovery has been made does not belong to the petitioner. The co-accused persons, who have been apprehended from the spot, have been granted bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 14.0.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 41300 of 2021 and order dated 28.02.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No.41877 of 2021, respectively. The petitioner is in custody since 05.03.2022 and the charge sheet has been submitted in this case.

¶20

Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail submitting that the huge quantity of liquor was recovered from the truck and the arrested co-accused persons specifically named this petitioner along with some other accused persons who have

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30757 of 2022(2) dt.26-08-2022 3/4

¶22

been supplying the illicit liquor in Bihar. The petitioner is a habitual offender and is accused in two such cases.

¶23

Having regard to the submissions made hereinabove and considering the fact that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot and nothing incriminating has been recovered from his person or possession and further considering the submission of charge sheet and the period of custody of the petitioner, he is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise Court No. 2, Muzaffarpur in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No. 750 of 2020, subject to the conditions mentioned in Section 437 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and also the following conditions :

¶24

(i) The bail bond of the petitioner will be accepted only after framing of charge, if not already framed.

¶25

(ii) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶26

(iii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below.

¶27

(iv) In case of absence on three consecutive

¶28

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30757 of 2022(2) dt.26-08-2022 4/4

¶29

dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

¶30

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)

¶31

V.K.Pandey/- U T

Vinod @ Vinod Kumar Kali @ Vinod Kali @ Vinod Kali Rakhna v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod @ Vinod Kumar Kali @ Vinod Kali @ Vinod Kali Rakhna v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Panchanand Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Ved Prakash Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.

Sarovar Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Mithlesh Kumar Singh @ Mukesh Kumar @ Mithilesh Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Baloda Vs The State of Bihar

Satyendra Kumar @ Satyendra Ram @Satyendra Das Vs the State of Bihar