Allowed

Mithlesh Kumar Singh @ Mukesh Kumar @ Mithilesh Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC26 Aug 2022CR. MISC./21446/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in an alcohol smuggling case. The court noted the petitioner was not arrested from the spot, no evidence was recovered from him, and he was already in custody post-charge sheet submission.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties.

Mithlesh Kumar Singh @ Mukesh Kumar @ Mithilesh Singh Vs… — Specific Performance | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21446 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2021 Thana- PIPRA District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Mithlesh Kumar Singh @ Mukesh Kumar @ Mithilesh Singh, S/O Chadradev Singh, R/o village- Kuwarpur, P.S.- Pipra, District- East Champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sharda Nand Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ramesh Chandra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 26-08-2022

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

A.P.P. for the State through video conferencing.

¶14

Let the defect(s), if any, as pointed out by the office

¶15

be removed within four weeks from the date of resumption of physical filing and physical removal of defect.

¶16

In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 39 of 2021 registered for the alleged offences under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶17

As per the prosecution case, total 5869.44 litres of India made foreign liquor was recovered from a truck and the police could not apprehend any person from the spot. During investigation, the name of the petitioner transpired as one of the accused persons who has brought this illicit liquor for supplying to other co-accused persons.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21446 of 2022(3) dt.26-08-2022 2/3

¶19

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not been arrested from the spot and nothing incriminating has been recovered from his person or possession. The name of the petitioner came up at the later stage of the investigation on the basis of confessional statement of coaccused Rajesh Singh, who has been granted bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.05.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No.62302 of 2021. The petitioner is having criminal antecedents and is accused in five more cases. However, he is on bail in all cases. The petitioner is in custody since 04.02.2022 and the charge sheet has been submitted in this case.

¶20

Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner submitting that the huge quantity of liquor was recovered and this liquor was brought at the instance of this petitioner and co-accused Rajesh Singh. The petitioner is a habitual offender and is accused in five such cases.

¶21

Perused the records.

¶22

Having regard to the submissions made hereinabove and considering the fact that the petitioner has not been arrested from the spot and nothing incriminating has been recovered from his person or possession and further considering the

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21446 of 2022(3) dt.26-08-2022 3/3

¶24

submission of charge sheet and the period of custody of the petitioner, he is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Court-2, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 39 of 2021, subject to the conditions mentioned in Section 437 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and also the following conditions :

¶25

(i) The bail bond of the petitioner will be accepted only after framing of charge, if not already framed.

¶26

(ii) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶27

(iii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below.

¶28

(iv) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

¶29

V.K.Pandey/-

¶30

U T

Mithlesh Kumar Singh @ Mukesh Kumar @ Mithilesh Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mithlesh Kumar Singh @ Mukesh Kumar @ Mithilesh Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Panchanand Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Ved Prakash Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.

Sarovar Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Vinod @ Vinod Kumar Kali @ Vinod Kali @ Vinod Kali Rakhna Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Baloda Vs The State of Bihar

Satyendra Kumar @ Satyendra Ram @Satyendra Das Vs the State of Bihar