Allowed

Ram Chandra Sah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 May 2022CR. MISC./3069/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted the petitioner anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under Sections 498A IPC and others. The petitioner was released on bail upon furnishing a bond and agreeing to pay monthly maintenance to the wife.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail subject to furnishing a bond and agreeing to pay Rs. 4,000 monthly maintenance to the wife against a period of one year.

Ram Chandra Sah Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3069 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Bhagalpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAM CHANDRA SAH S/o Suresh Sah R/o village- Bhramarpur, P.S.Bihpur, District- Bhagalpur

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Rupa Kumari W/o Ram Chandra Sah, D/o Shyam Sundar Sah @ Tuntun Sah R/o village- Kharik Bazar, P.S.- Kharik, District- Bhagalpur

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amrendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 17-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶12

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 498A, 341, 323, 504 & 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Petitioner, who is husband of opposite party no2.,

¶14

is said to have ousted the opposite party no.2 from her matrimonial home in association of his family members over the dowry demand.

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is an innocent person and has committed no offence. Petitioner has neither made any dowry demand nor drove her out of her matrimonial home nor

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3069 of 2020(3) dt.17-05-2022 2/3

¶17

tormented her over the demand of dowry. He is still ready to keep her with full honour and dignity. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar , reported in 2006 (3) PLJR 182 .

¶18

In that view of the matter, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Naugachia Mahila P.S. Case No.52/2018, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.,

¶19

Petitioner is ready to pay Rs.4,000.00 (Rupees Four Thousand) per month to opposite party no.2 in the second week of every month for a period of one year. If the petitioner fails to pay the aforesaid amount on two consecutive months, opposite party no.2 shall be at liberty to move before the learned Court below for cancelling the bail bond of the petitioner.

¶20

It goes without saying that the aforesaid payment shall be subject to any order being passed in matrimonial

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3069 of 2020(3) dt.17-05-2022 3/3

¶22

maintenance case or any other collateral proceedings.

¶23

Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 is directed

¶24

to make available the bank account details of opposite party no.2 in the learned Court below.

¶25

If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the learned Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Center for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement.

¶26

Accordingly, this application stands disposed of.

¶27

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶28

Trivedi/-

¶29

U T

Ram Chandra Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Chandra Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shivan Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Abhinandan Singh @ Kundan Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Masam @ Md. Masoom Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Kumar @ Khishori Vs The State of Bihar

Markandey Chauhan @ Merkandey Chauhan Vs The State of Bihar

Kailash Kedia @ Kailash Kumar Kedia Vs the State of Bihar