Allowed

Dhirendra Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Nov 2022CR. MISC./30506/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners arrested or likely to be arrested in a case involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 353, 504, and 34 of the IPC. Bail was conditioned on surrender within six weeks and furnishing bonds.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners be released on anticipatory bail on surrender before the trial court within six weeks, furnishing bail bonds and sureties.

Dhirendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30506 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2022 Thana- MURLIGANJ District- Madhepura

¶3

======================================================

¶4

DHIRENDRA YADAV Son of Late Vibhisan Yadav Resident of Village - Tinkonma, Ward No.- 11, P.S.- Murliganj, District - Madhepura.

¶5

Sanjay Ram Son of Sundar Ram Resident of Village - Tinkonma, Ward No.11, P.S.- Murliganj, District - Madhepura.

¶6

Samir Kumar Suraj @ Samir KUmar Son of Dhirendra Yadav Resident of Village - Tinkonma, Ward No.- 11, P.S.- Murliganj, District - Madhepura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, A.P.P.

¶12

======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 21-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶15

A.P.P. for the State.

¶16

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 353, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

The informant alleges that when he along with other officials were on duty for collecting electricity dues and disconnecting the line of defaulters, the petitioners misbehaved and assaulted him causing obstruction in discharge of official duties.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30506 of 2022(2) dt.21-11-2022 2/2

¶20

petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and have been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that the allegation of misbehavior and assault is general and omnibus in nature.

¶21

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

¶22

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Murliganj P.S. Case No. 104 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶23

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶24

GauravSinha/-

¶25

U T

Dhirendra Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhirendra Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Priyanshu Saurabh Vs The State of Bihar

Bhanu Kumar Manjhi @ Bhanu Manjhi Vs the State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar @ Guddu Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Satendra Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Ravindra Yadav @Rabindra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar