Allowed

Bhanu Kumar Manjhi @ Bhanu Manjhi v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Nov 2022CR. MISC./9561/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners in an FIR involving various IPC offences, directing their release upon arrest or surrender within six weeks subject to bond and surety conditions under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Released on anticipatory bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount within six weeks of arrest or surrender.

Bhanu Kumar Manjhi @ Bhanu Manjhi Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9561 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-148 Year-2020 Thana- PANAPUR District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

BHANU KUMAR MANJHI @ BHANU MANJHI SON OF LATE GUMANI MANJHI R/O VILLAGE- DHENUKI, P.S.- PANAPUR, DISTRICT- SARAN

¶5

RAJESH KUMAR MANJHI @ RAJESH MANJHI SON OF LATE GUMANI MANJHI R/O VILLAGE- DHENUKI, P.S.- PANAPUR, DISTRICT- SARAN

¶6

MUKESH MANJHI SON OF SHAMBHU MANJHI R/O VILLAGEDHENUKI, P.S.- PANAPUR, DISTRICT- SARAN

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Harish Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, APP ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA

¶13

ORAL ORDER

¶14

3 18-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶15

A.P.P. for the State through virtual Court proceedings.

¶16

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 354(B), 379, 436, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and have been falsely implicated in the present case by the informant, it is next submitted that Krishna Manjhi and Shailesh Manjhi have been granted anticipatory bail vide order dated 13.09.2022 in Cr.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9561 of 2022(3) dt.18-11-2022 2/2

¶19

Misc. No. 10809 of 2022 and Bacha Manjhi has been granted anticipatory bail vide order dated 01.09.2022 in Cr. Misc. No. 7826 of 2022. Learned counsel submits that case of the petitioners are on a better footing than the case of Krishna Manjhi and Shailesh Manjhi, further the allegation of assault against the petitioners is general and omnibus in nature.

¶20

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

¶21

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Panapur P.S. Case No. 148 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶22

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶23

Rishi/-

¶24

U T

Bhanu Kumar Manjhi @ Bhanu Manjhi v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhanu Kumar Manjhi @ Bhanu Manjhi v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nand Lal Prasad Vs the State of Bihar

Sameeksha Srivastava @ Samichha Shrivastav Vs The State of BIhar

Arun Kumar @ Arun Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Priyanshu Saurabh Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar @ Guddu Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Saroj Choubey Vs The State of Bihar