Ram Prasad Yadav v. the State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court Bench dismissed petitions for anticipatory bail filed by multiple accused in a case involving illegal mining and storage of sand. The court rejected relief citing the petitioners' criminal antecedents. Counsel was directed to remove procedural defects within one month.
What did the court decide?
Petitions for anticipatory bail rejected; tokens of defect rectification sent to petitioners.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29547 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-760 Year-2020 Thana- BANKA District- Banka
====================================================== RAM PRASAD YADAV Son of Sri. Bhagirath Yadav Resident of VillageLashkari, Police Station- Banka, District- Banka.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
- THE STATE OF BIHAR
- The Assistant Director, Mines and Geology Department Banka. Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
======================================================
with
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 29986 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-760 Year-2020 Thana- BANKA District- Banka
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted or rejected given the criminal antecedents of the petitioners.
Whether defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within the arraignment have been rectified.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ram Prasad Yadav and Pradeep Yadav
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Nawneet Kumar Pandey
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court