In this criminal miscellaneous appeal, the Patna High Court rejected the petitioner's prayer for anticipatory bail in a case involving the alleged missing of an informant's truck, where the petitioner stood accused of the offence under Sections 406, 120B, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29078 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-139 Year-2019 Thana- JHAJHA District- Jamui
======================================================
PINTU YADAV Son of Dwarik Yadav Resident of Village- Dubarpahari, P.S.Jhajha, District- Jamui.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Umesh Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Bharat Bhushan ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
3 19-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 406/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per the prosecution case, on 13.05.2019, this petitioner, who was driver of the truck of informant, is alleged to have handed over the truck to his friend Jitendra Yadav and on 18.05.2019, Jitendra Yadav came at Jhajha Bust stand after unloading the truck and on 20.05.2019 at about 2 PM, petitioner informed the informant regarding missing of his truck.
It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner handed over the truck to another driver namely Jitendra Yadav on the instruction of informant and as such, he is nowhere involved in the missing of truck of informant.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29078 of 2021(3) dt.19-07-2022 2/2
However, learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the bail petition and submitted that petitioner is driver of the said truck and vehicle is still traceless and police after investigation has submitted chargesheet against this petitioner.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
anay/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the prayer for anticipatory bail should be rejected.
PINTU YADAV
The State of Bihar
PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
