Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous application on the ground that the trial had ended. The High Court dismissed the application as infructuous.
Refusal to allow withdrawal of criminal miscellaneous application due to termination of trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2880 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2021 Thana- HASANPUR District- Samastipur
======================================================
Sachin Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar Son Of Ram Ekbal Mahto @ Ramikaval Mahto R/O Village- Karsauli, P.S.- Hasanpur, District- Samastipur
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, APP. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER
3 21-07-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during
pendency of this Cr. Misc., the trial ended and as such the present application became infructuous, therefore, permission sought for withdrawal of this case.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed as infructuous.
(Dr. Anshuman, J.)
guddu/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow withdrawal of criminal miscellaneous application.
Sachin Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar
DR. ANSHUMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
