Allowed

Vijay Swarnkar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Aug 2022CR. MISC./28418/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted bail to the petitioner, Vijay Swarnkar, facing trial for murder under Sections 302 and 34 IPC after noting that another co-accused had already been released on bail. The court imposed conditions including appearance before the trial court and police and requiring a family member as a surety.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is released on bail by furnishing ₹10,000 bond along with two sureties of like amount, subject to strict conditions.

Vijay Swarnkar Vs the State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28418 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-338 Year-2020 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura

¶3

======================================================

¶4

VIJAY SWARNKAR S/o Late Shatrudhan Swarnkar Resident of VillageBharrahi, P.S.- Madhepura, District- Madhepura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dinesh Prasad Verma, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 25-08-2022

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

¶12

Let the defect(s) be removed within four weeks of the

¶13

complete start of the physical Court in normal course.

¶14

The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection with Sessions Trial No.30/2021 arising out of Madhepura P.S. Case No.338/2020 instituted under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

As per the allegation in the FIR, the informant has alleged that the wife of Bihari Swarnkar was throwing dirty water and garbage in front of his shop and on protest they started abusing him. Further, it is alleged that the accused person’s family members also came and started fighting with them and in the said assault, Dulari Devi, mother of the informant died.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28418 of 2022(2) dt.25-08-2022 2/3

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner including the accused persons of assaulting which resulted into the unfortunate death of Dulari Devi. He further submits that the similar co-accused namely Saben Swarnkar and Raben Swarnkar have already been granted the privilege of bail vide Cr. Misc. No.23693/2021 on 04.09.2021 by co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

¶18

Taking into account the aforesaid fact as also the charge-sheet stands submitted and the petitioner is in custody since 20.02.2021 (as stated in para-15 of the bail application) and one of the co-accused has since been granted bail, this Court is inclined to grant him privilege of bail.

¶19

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Sessions Trial No.30/2021 arising out of Madhepura P.S. Case No.338/2020 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge, VI, Madhepura, subject to following conditions:

¶20

(i) one of the bailor should be the family member of the petitioner, who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide;

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28418 of 2022(2) dt.25-08-2022 3/3

¶22

(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reasons will entail cancellation of his bail by the Trial court itself;

¶23

(iii) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned police station every fortnight for next six months to mark his presence;

¶24

(iv) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again failing which the State shall be at liberty to steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

¶25

With the aforesaid observations, the bail application is

¶26

allowed.

¶27

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶28

Prakash Narayan /- U T

Vijay Swarnkar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Swarnkar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shivesh Paswan @ Shivesh Kumar Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Gangadhar Pandey @ Gangadhar Paney Vs the State of Bihar

Punit Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Kumar Paswan @ Sunil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kuldeep Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Radheshyam Paswan@ Radheshyam Ram Vs The State of Bihar