Allowed

Baleshwar Bin @ Baleshar Bin v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Sept 2022CR. MISC./28354/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an oral order, this Court granted regular bail to the petitioner, permitting him to remove defects in his bail application within four weeks. The bail was secured by a bond of Rs. 20,000 plus two sureties, subject to a condition of appearing on all court dates.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of the like amount each, on condition of appearing on all dates.

Baleshwar Bin @ Baleshar Bin Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28354 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-17 Year-2022 Thana- LAUKARIA District- West Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

BALESHWAR BIN @ BALESHAR BIN Son of Late Subhash Bin Resident of village - Aragana Tola, Police Station- Laukariya, District - West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vijay Kr Singh No. 1 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶9

ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 22-09-2022

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode.

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

¶13

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under section 341, 436, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to have set the hut of the informant on fire and Rs. 3,30,000 cash, box, chauki, palang, utensils, ornaments were burnt to ashes.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that

¶16

the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. No incriminating article has been found at the place of occurrence. There is land dispute between the parties. There is no eye witness in this case. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 09.03.2022.

¶17

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, West Champaran in connection with Laukariya P.S. Case No. 17 of 2022, with a condition:-

¶19

The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

¶20

The application stands allowed.

¶21

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶22

niku/-

¶23

U T

Baleshwar Bin @ Baleshar Bin v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baleshwar Bin @ Baleshar Bin v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Noor Jahan Khatoon Vs the State of Bihar

Satendra Singh @ Satendra Narayan Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Satyanarain Rajak @ Satyanarayan Rajak Vs the State of Bihar

Kundan Kumar Singh @ Kundan Kumar @ Kundan Singh @ Rajesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Harish Chandra Paswan @ Harichandra Paswan Vs the State of Bihar

Ashutosh Anand @ Rocky Singh @ Rocky @ Rocky Kumar Vs the State of Bihar