Allowed

Om Prakash Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC29 Mar 2022CR. MISC./28070/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an oral order granting anticipatory bail to petitioner no.2, Bablu Kumar, in a case where petitioner no.1 was the assailant. The court allowed bail upon arrest/surrender within four weeks, conditioned on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail upon arrest/surrender within four weeks by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 1st, Madhepura.

Om Prakash Yadav Vs the State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28070 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-144 Year-2020 Thana- SHANKARPUR District- Madhepura

¶3

======================================================

¶4

OM PRAKASH YADAV, Son of Late Motilal Yadav.

¶5

Bablu Kumar, Son of Om Prakash Yadav.

¶6

Both resident of Village - Maura Baghla, Ward No.2, P.S,Shankarpur, Distt.- Madhepura.

¶7

... ... Petitioners

¶8

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Naresh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Ms. Sucheta Yadav, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 29-03-2022

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶12

The supplementary affidavit filed by learned

¶13

counsel for the petitioners is taken on record.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

¶15

This application for anticipatory bail arises out of Shankarpur P.S. Case No. 144 of 2020 for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 354-B, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

The assailant of the injured is petitioner no.1 namely, Om Prakash Yadav, who has been arrested by the police and on his behalf this anticipatory bail application has already

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28070 of 2021(3) dt.29-03-2022 2/2

¶18

been dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 09.03.2022.

¶19

The petitioner no.2 is not the assailant of the informant and the injury sustained by the informant is found to be simple in nature.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts, this anticipatory bail application is allowed on behalf of petitioner no.2, above named.

¶21

Let the petitioner no.2, above named, in the event of his arrest/surrender within four weeks from today in the Court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 1^st , Madhepura, in connection with Shankarpur P.S. Case No. 144 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶22

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶23

pawan/-

¶24

U T

Om Prakash Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Om Prakash Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rupesh Pandey @ Rupesh Kumar Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

Praduman Kumar @ Praduman Mahto Vs the State of Bihar

Ram Swarup Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Usha Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Babulal Sah @ Lalbabu Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Deeplal Manjhi @ Hitlal Manjhi Vs the State of Bihar