Allowed

Pankaj Kumar @ Nanku @ Nanhaku Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Sept 2022CR. MISC./27420/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an oral order granting regular bail to the petitioner an arms case registered under Sections 25 and 26 of the Arms Act. The court allowed the petition directing the petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of like amount each.

Pankaj Kumar @ Nanku @ Nanhaku Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27420 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-25 Year-2022 Thana- CHANDAUTI District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

PANKAJ KUMAR @ NANKU @ NANHAKU YADAV Son of Indradeo Yadav Resident of Village - Lalganj, P.S.- Cahndauti, District - Gaya

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bindeswari Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Murli Dhar ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 12-09-2022

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode.

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

¶15

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered u/s 25(1-B)a and 26 of the Arms Act.

¶16

As per the prosecution case, one loaded automatic pistol was recovered and seized by the police from the waist of the petitioner Pankaj Kumar@Nanku.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27420 of 2022(2) dt.12-09-2022 2/2

¶19

case. The petitioner is accused in one more case which is related to theft as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 01.02.2022.

¶20

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶21

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned Court below, Gaya, in connection with Chandauti P.S. Case No. 25 of 2022.

¶22

The application stands allowed.

¶23

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶24

shobhakri/-

¶25

U T

Pankaj Kumar @ Nanku @ Nanhaku Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pankaj Kumar @ Nanku @ Nanhaku Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sachida Mandal @ Master Vs the State of Bihar

Vishal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Lochan Thakur @ Sailendra Thakur Vs the State of Bihar

Neeraj Raj Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Sarvjeet Kumar @Hariom Vs The State of Bihar