Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous application due to his arrest. The court granted the permission and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw application granted; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2739 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-515 Year-2019 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul
======================================================
Dilip Malakar Son of Lakshman Malakar Resident of Village - Sahu Tola, Gandhipath Ward No.10, P.s.- Saharsa, Distt.- Saharsa.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava ======================================================
that during pendency of this application, the sole petitioner has been arrested and, as such, he seeks permission to withdraw this application.
Permission is accorded.
This application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)
amandeep/-
U
Dilip Malakar
The State of Bihar
Sunil Kumar Panwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
