Allowed

Aamir Mansuri v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Aug 2022CR. MISC./26854/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna allowed bail to the petitioner in an excise case involving illegal liquor manufacturing. The court considered the petitioner's clean antecedents, lack of conscious possession, and completion of investigation as grounds for release on a bond of Rs. 10,000/.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each.

Aamir Mansuri Vs the State of Bihar — Corruption | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26854 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-131 Year-2022 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Aamir Mansuri Son of Aslam Mansuri @ Md. Aslam Ansury Resident of Mohalla- Taj Nagar Karbala Road, P.S.- Phulwarisharif, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Satyendra Narayan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 05-08-2022

¶11

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State through virtual Court proceedings.

¶12

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Gaya Excise Case No. 131 of 2022 registered for the offence under Sections 30(a) and 56(B) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

¶14

The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 05.03.2022.

¶15

The allegation against the petitioner is to be engaged in illegal trading/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where, there is

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26854 of 2022(2) dt.05-08-2022 2/3

¶17

recovery of 44.250 litres of IMFL from Mahindra Xylo Vehicle bearing registration no. BR01PC-6488.

¶18

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that nothing surfaced during course of investigation, which may suggest that petitioner was under knowledge to have in possession of illegal consignment of illicit liquor. It is also submitted that petitioner is a man of clean antecedent. While concluding the argument, it has been submitted that investigation has been completed, for which, charge-sheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

¶19

Learned APP, while opposing the prayer of bail, fairly conceded that the petitioner is driver of the alleged vehicle.

¶20

Considering the facts and circumstances as mentioned above, as recovery of illicit liquor is not made from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner, who is a man of clean antecedent coupled with the fact that charge-sheet has been submitted, let the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Gaya Excise Case No. 131 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Excise Court No.-03,

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26854 of 2022(2) dt.05-08-2022 3/3

¶22

Gaya/concerned court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C.

¶23

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)

¶24

pooja/-

¶25

U T

Aamir Mansuri v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aamir Mansuri v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Fazle Ali @ Rizvi @ Phajlay @ Rizwi Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Guddu Vs The State Of Bihar

Braj Kishore Rai Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Kapil Kumar @ Kapil Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Jai Prakash Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Surendra Vs the State of Bihar