Allowed

Shiv Paswan v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC26 Aug 2022CR. MISC./26826/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna allowed the petitioner's bail application in a case involving offences under the IPC and Arms Act. The court ordered release on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to appearance conditions and restrictions.

What did the court decide?

Release of the petitioner on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties subject to specified conditions regarding appearance and conduct.

Shiv Paswan Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26826 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-324 Year-2021 Thana- OBRA District- Aurangabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SHIV PASWAN Son of Late Bira Paswan Resident of Village - Lila Bigha, P.s.- Obra, Distt.- Aurangabad (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Leelawati Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Satyendra Narayan Singh,APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 26-08-2022

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

APP for the State in Virtual Court Proceeding.

¶15

Let the defect(s), if any, as pointed out by the office, be removed within four weeks.

¶16

The case is registered under sections 399, 402 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act in connection with Obra P.S. Case No. 324 of 2021.

¶17

As per the allegation in the FIR, upon secret information, the police went to the place and apprehended a host of persons which included the petitioner herein.

¶18

So far as the allegation against the petitioner is concerned, upon search of this person, a mobile was recovered.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is not the case of the police that it was a stolen mobile rather the

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26826 of 2022(2) dt.26-08-2022 2/3

¶21

petitioner’s mobile was shown in the seizure list. The counsel submits that only because the petitioner has criminal antecedent, he has been implicated in this case and he has already suffered by being in jail since 13.12.2021 (as stated in para-11 of the bail application).

¶22

Taking into account the fact that so far as this petitioner is concerned, there is allegation of recovery of mobile, he is in custody since 13.12.2021 and the charge-sheet stands submitted, this Court is inclined to grant him the privilege of bail.

¶23

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad (Bihar), in connection with Obra P.S. Case No. 324 of 2021 subject to the following conditions:

¶24

(i) one of the bailors should be the family members of the petitioner, who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide;

¶25

(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reasons will entail his cancellation of bail by the Trial Court itself;

¶26

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26826 of 2022(2) dt.26-08-2022 3/3

¶27

(iii) he shall appear before the concerned police station every fortnight for next six months to mark his presence;

¶28

(iv) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

¶29

With the aforesaid observations, the bail application is

allowed.

(Rajiv Roy, J)

Ravi/-

U T

Shiv Paswan v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shiv Paswan v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Kumar Thakur @ Rahul Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Swarnkar Vs the State of Bihar

Ram Naresh Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

Nain Devi @ Naina Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Suraj Kumar@ Abhishek Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rambharosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar