Criminal Miscellaneous application withdrawn by counsel for the petitioner as he had been arrested, rendering the application infructuous. Court dismissed the application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26132 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-222 Year-2021 Thana- NOORSARAI District- Nalanda
======================================================
Ayodhya Chouhan
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar, Advocate with : Mr. Ayodhya Chauhan, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Akbar Ali, APP. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 07-06-2022 Heard Mr. Surendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Akbar Ali, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present application as the petitioner has been arrested and the same has become infructuous.
It is, thus, dismissed as withdrawn as having become infructuous.
(Harish Kumar, J)
Shakir /-
U T
Ayodhya Chouhan
The State of Bihar
Harish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
