Criminal miscellaneous applicant sought permission to withdraw an application due to the petitioner's arrest, rendering it infructuous. The High Court dismissed the withdrawal request on the grounds that the application had already become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10152 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-410 Year-2021 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul
======================================================
Bechu Yadav@ Becho Yadav
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jata Shankar Jha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, APP. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 07-06-2022
Heard Mr. Jata Shankar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present application as the petitioner has been arrested and the same has become infructuous.
It is, thus, dismissed as withdrawn as having become infructuous.
(Harish Kumar, J)
Shakir /- U T
Bechu Yadav@ Becho Yadav
The State of Bihar
Harish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
